Disclaimer (another word for a rant)

Here are some of my pet peeves, - sorted out, that is.

Correspondence Policy. I will only read or respond to reasonable, polite, and sincere emails, from readers who are genuinely interested in the content on this website. Any abusive, derogatory, rude or overly negative emails will simply be binned. Persistent offenders will have their IP banned. I am not going to get embroiled in lengthy arguments over whether my views or perceptions of the world are wrong or bad, and I am certainly not going to get involved in arguments why I should modify my views to suit those of other people who believe they know better...This website IS my argument already. If you don't like what I say, or the way that I say it, too bad. If you disagree with what I write and wish to take me to task over it, this website is my response. I am really only interested in presenting this information so others can learn it, and only interested in helping people better understand the content of this site. I am not going to waste my time proving the unprovable to non-believers, skeptics or debunkers. For those of you who can see the merit in this material, it is a gift that you can take and use for yourself

Originality. As far as I can determine, nothing like the Triplex Unity Theory has been made public before this website, by anyone else. While I have been influenced by a variety of well established traditions, some of which form the basis for this theory here, the integration of ideas that have crystallised into this theory are my own. If there is something around that someone believes is the same as Triplex Unity Theory but under a different name then I will be happy to scrutinise it, but will only accept it as same if I am satisfied that it is indeed the same, otherwise, I will continue to promote this theory as my own.

Responsibility. I will take no responsibility for any loss, damage, injury or any general SNAFU's incurred by others while trying to put these principles into practice. If you lose a game of chess, or your life savings on the markets, or end up accidentally blowing up a government building from visualising complex vector geometry in your head while driving, as a result of implementing the ideas contained in this website, it is from your own misguided stupidity rather than any inherent error or failure of the Triplex Unity Theory itself. It works for me, so you should be able to make it work for yourself.

Tao, Taoist and Taoism. When speaking in general terms, I prefer to use the word Tao instead of Dao, Taoist instead of Daoist, and Taoism instead of Daoism, as is the ever increasing trend these days. Use of the letter "D" stems from the Hanyu Pinyin transliteration of in the language of the People's Republic Of China, which is a guide to pronunciation. The old Wade-Giles form of rendering of is Tao, and had been for a century. The words Tao, Taoist, and Taoism, along with their ideas and cultural attachments, have now grown into our wider, collective consciousness as an English speaking people, before the prevalence of pinyin, and therefore Tao, Taoism and Taoist with a "T" has become part of common English usage. I believe it is pointless, if not pretentious, to now go and change it to Dao, Daoism, and Daoist. Besides it sounds silly with a "D". The Chinese don't go around saying "ta shi yi ge Daoist" so why should we in English now start going around saying "He is a -ist".

Trinity. Use of the word "trinity" on this site does not claim a connection to nor does it bear any simialrity to Trinitarian thought of the Christian doctrine. I may be wrong but I don't think Trinitarian doctrine as any real practical application in the modern world at all, it is simply an observation of a phenomena...and I am not sure that either the Bible text nor its translations successfully elucidates the idea it is trying to portray anyway...

Triplex. It's not pronounced "Triple-x" its "Trip-lex", as in "duplex"...simplex....